<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 780 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337700</link>
    <description>Payments to a foreign group company for IT support were treated as reimbursements for group-level services and cost allocations, not royalty under the Income-tax Act or the India-Canada DTAA, because the payer acquired no right to use equipment, copyright, or other protected software rights; accordingly, no withholding obligation arose under section 195. Payments for management support and advisory services were not fees for included services because the services did not make available technical knowledge, skill, know-how, or processes to the recipient, so they were not chargeable to tax in India and no tax deduction at source was required. The appellate order deleting the withholding demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:23:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 780 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337700</link>
      <description>Payments to a foreign group company for IT support were treated as reimbursements for group-level services and cost allocations, not royalty under the Income-tax Act or the India-Canada DTAA, because the payer acquired no right to use equipment, copyright, or other protected software rights; accordingly, no withholding obligation arose under section 195. Payments for management support and advisory services were not fees for included services because the services did not make available technical knowledge, skill, know-how, or processes to the recipient, so they were not chargeable to tax in India and no tax deduction at source was required. The appellate order deleting the withholding demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>