<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned: No Evidence of Intentional Wrongdoing in Income Reclassification by Taxpayer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32880</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since there is only a change of head of income from ‘STCG’ as declared by the assessee to ‘business income’ as held by the AO and no evidence brought on record that the assessee’s claim was not bona fide - No penalty - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:22:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:22:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned: No Evidence of Intentional Wrongdoing in Income Reclassification by Taxpayer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32880</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since there is only a change of head of income from ‘STCG’ as declared by the assessee to ‘business income’ as held by the AO and no evidence brought on record that the assessee’s claim was not bona fide - No penalty - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:22:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>