<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 777 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the reclassification of income without evidence of inaccurate particulars did not justify the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the importance of a bona fide belief in income classification and aligned with established legal precedents. As a result, the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;1,18,735/- for A.Y. 2008-09 was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 777 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the reclassification of income without evidence of inaccurate particulars did not justify the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the importance of a bona fide belief in income classification and aligned with established legal precedents. As a result, the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;1,18,735/- for A.Y. 2008-09 was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>