<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 771 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 22,99,72,607/-, concluding that the expenses were incurred for business promotion and not as prohibited freebies. The MCI regulations were found to be applicable only to medical practitioners, and the CBDT Circular could not retrospectively apply to the assessment year in question. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 771 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 22,99,72,607/-, concluding that the expenses were incurred for business promotion and not as prohibited freebies. The MCI regulations were found to be applicable only to medical practitioners, and the CBDT Circular could not retrospectively apply to the assessment year in question. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>