https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189616 The appellant, involved in manufacturing woolen/blended fabrics, faced allegations of irregular CENVAT credit availment, leading to a demand for interest and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand, prompting the appellant's appeal. The appellant argued that errors were rectified before the notice, relying on legal precedents to contest the imposition of interest. The Judicial Member, aligning with relevant case laws, set aside the order, granting relief to the appellant based on established legal interpretations and jurisdictional precedents. en-us Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:45:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189616 The appellant, involved in manufacturing woolen/blended fabrics, faced allegations of irregular CENVAT credit availment, leading to a demand for interest and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand, prompting the appellant's appeal. The appellant argued that errors were rectified before the notice, relying on legal precedents to contest the imposition of interest. The Judicial Member, aligning with relevant case laws, set aside the order, granting relief to the appellant based on established legal interpretations and jurisdictional precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189616