<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 763 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) determining that the commission received by the respondent for selling SIM cards had already been included in the assessable value for service tax purposes. The service tax paid by BSNL covered the commission amount, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the disposal of the respondent&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 763 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) determining that the commission received by the respondent for selling SIM cards had already been included in the assessable value for service tax purposes. The service tax paid by BSNL covered the commission amount, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the disposal of the respondent&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>