<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 761 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337681</link>
    <description>The court upheld the show-cause notice challenged by the petitioner under Cenvat Credit Rules and the Finance Act, finding it legally issued despite lacking certain particulars. The court emphasized the availability of statutory remedies in fiscal matters and dismissed the challenge through a writ petition. Additionally, the court rejected the plea to prevent future show-cause notices, stating it was impermissible to restrain the competent authority&#039;s statutory powers. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notice within a specified period, with the adjudicating authority instructed to decide after a personal hearing and due process, closing the connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 761 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337681</link>
      <description>The court upheld the show-cause notice challenged by the petitioner under Cenvat Credit Rules and the Finance Act, finding it legally issued despite lacking certain particulars. The court emphasized the availability of statutory remedies in fiscal matters and dismissed the challenge through a writ petition. Additionally, the court rejected the plea to prevent future show-cause notices, stating it was impermissible to restrain the competent authority&#039;s statutory powers. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notice within a specified period, with the adjudicating authority instructed to decide after a personal hearing and due process, closing the connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>