<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 753 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337673</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that proceedings against the appellant were unsustainable following the demise of the appellant&#039;s proprietor. The Commissioner&#039;s decision dismissing the abatement claim was overturned, emphasizing the need to respect higher forum decisions and established legal principles. Citing the Apex Court&#039;s ruling in Shabina Abraham&#039;s case, the Tribunal concluded that continuing proceedings post proprietor&#039;s death was improper. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant with any consequential relief, based on the judicial pronouncements and settled legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 753 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337673</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that proceedings against the appellant were unsustainable following the demise of the appellant&#039;s proprietor. The Commissioner&#039;s decision dismissing the abatement claim was overturned, emphasizing the need to respect higher forum decisions and established legal principles. Citing the Apex Court&#039;s ruling in Shabina Abraham&#039;s case, the Tribunal concluded that continuing proceedings post proprietor&#039;s death was improper. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant with any consequential relief, based on the judicial pronouncements and settled legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>