<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 743 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337663</link>
    <description>Rectification of the register of members and oppression-and-mismanagement claims were held unsuitable for summary tribunal determination where the dispute turned on unresolved questions of title, transmission of shares, fraud and alleged fabrication of records, all already forming the core of a civil suit; the proper forum for those issues was the civil court. The Tribunal also held that the petitioner lacked standing under Sections 397, 398 and 399 of the Companies Act, 1956 because the petitioner was not shown as a member in the register and the asserted holding fell below the statutory threshold. The company petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 743 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337663</link>
      <description>Rectification of the register of members and oppression-and-mismanagement claims were held unsuitable for summary tribunal determination where the dispute turned on unresolved questions of title, transmission of shares, fraud and alleged fabrication of records, all already forming the core of a civil suit; the proper forum for those issues was the civil court. The Tribunal also held that the petitioner lacked standing under Sections 397, 398 and 399 of the Companies Act, 1956 because the petitioner was not shown as a member in the register and the asserted holding fell below the statutory threshold. The company petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>