https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337661 A court not notified as a Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had no jurisdiction to issue a production warrant or remand an accused to judicial custody in PMLA proceedings. The statutory scheme under Sections 43 and 44 vests trial of the scheduled offence and the money-laundering offence exclusively in the notified Special Court for the area concerned, and incidental powers under Sections 267 and 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be exercised by a court lacking special-statute jurisdiction. The remand order was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be placed before the competent Special Court. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337661 A court not notified as a Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 had no jurisdiction to issue a production warrant or remand an accused to judicial custody in PMLA proceedings. The statutory scheme under Sections 43 and 44 vests trial of the scheduled offence and the money-laundering offence exclusively in the notified Special Court for the area concerned, and incidental powers under Sections 267 and 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be exercised by a court lacking special-statute jurisdiction. The remand order was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be placed before the competent Special Court. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337661