https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189598 Section 3 of the United Provinces Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was upheld because the legislature had itself laid down the policy, the governing standard, and the limits of delegated action, leaving only implementation details to the executive. The provision was therefore not struck down for excessive delegation. Government Orders Nos. 615 and 671 dated 15 March 1951 were also upheld because the required statutory satisfaction had in fact been reached before issuance; although an express recital was desirable, its absence did not invalidate the orders where compliance with the condition precedent was otherwise proved. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:55:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189598 Section 3 of the United Provinces Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was upheld because the legislature had itself laid down the policy, the governing standard, and the limits of delegated action, leaving only implementation details to the executive. The provision was therefore not struck down for excessive delegation. Government Orders Nos. 615 and 671 dated 15 March 1951 were also upheld because the required statutory satisfaction had in fact been reached before issuance; although an express recital was desirable, its absence did not invalidate the orders where compliance with the condition precedent was otherwise proved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189598