https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189595 The Supreme Court upheld a statutory scheme prohibiting transfer of granted lands and treating transfers made in breach of grant conditions as void, holding that transferees who knowingly took land subject to such restrictions acquired only a defeasible interest. The law's summary mechanism for resumption and restoration of lands for the benefit of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes was found constitutionally valid, and the challenges under Articles 19(1)(f), 31, 31A and 14 failed. The absence of an appeal did not require a final ruling because an appellate remedy was later introduced. The enactment was sustained, but only to the extent that it did not disturb titles already perfected before commencement. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189595 The Supreme Court upheld a statutory scheme prohibiting transfer of granted lands and treating transfers made in breach of grant conditions as void, holding that transferees who knowingly took land subject to such restrictions acquired only a defeasible interest. The law's summary mechanism for resumption and restoration of lands for the benefit of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes was found constitutionally valid, and the challenges under Articles 19(1)(f), 31, 31A and 14 failed. The absence of an appeal did not require a final ruling because an appellate remedy was later introduced. The enactment was sustained, but only to the extent that it did not disturb titles already perfected before commencement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189595