<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (3) TMI 92 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189593</link>
    <description>A bona fide mistake by counsel in calculating the limitation period can amount to sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The delay here arose only because the advocate incorrectly noted the last filing date, and the explanation was supported by affidavit and not disbelieved. The Court treated the error as distinct from negligence and accepted that the party had acted through the University and left the matter to counsel. Refusal to condone the two-day delay was therefore incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (3) TMI 92 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189593</link>
      <description>A bona fide mistake by counsel in calculating the limitation period can amount to sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The delay here arose only because the advocate incorrectly noted the last filing date, and the explanation was supported by affidavit and not disbelieved. The Court treated the error as distinct from negligence and accepted that the party had acted through the University and left the matter to counsel. Refusal to condone the two-day delay was therefore incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>