<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 739 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c), finding no deliberate attempt by the assessee to conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The genuineness of the expenditure was established, and the provisions of Section 194H/194C were deemed inapplicable. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 739 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c), finding no deliberate attempt by the assessee to conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The genuineness of the expenditure was established, and the provisions of Section 194H/194C were deemed inapplicable. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>