<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 735 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined to decide the referred questions on the merits because it treated the issue as an academic controversy, and the petition was disposed of on that basis. The assessee was left at liberty to seek stay in accordance with law, so no substantive adjudication was made on the underlying dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 735 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined to decide the referred questions on the merits because it treated the issue as an academic controversy, and the petition was disposed of on that basis. The assessee was left at liberty to seek stay in accordance with law, so no substantive adjudication was made on the underlying dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>