<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 730 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee, as the reference made by the AO to the DVO regarding Fair Market Value as on 01/04/1981 for AY 2004-2005 was deemed invalid. The Tribunal held that the reference was not justified when the FMV offered by the assessee was higher than the DVO&#039;s valuation, citing a precedent from the Bombay High Court and the relevant amendment in Section 55A(a) by the Finance Act 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 730 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee, as the reference made by the AO to the DVO regarding Fair Market Value as on 01/04/1981 for AY 2004-2005 was deemed invalid. The Tribunal held that the reference was not justified when the FMV offered by the assessee was higher than the DVO&#039;s valuation, citing a precedent from the Bombay High Court and the relevant amendment in Section 55A(a) by the Finance Act 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>