<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 714 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the appellant, a Telecommunication Services provider, in a case concerning the classification of SIM cards as inputs or capital goods for cenvat credit purposes. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s arguments, supported by legal precedents and court decisions, were valid. It found that the appellant&#039;s position aligned with the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision and established legal principles, setting aside the orders demanding interest and penalties. The judgment underscored the significance of legal precedents and interpretations in resolving disputes related to credit availed and liability for interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 714 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the appellant, a Telecommunication Services provider, in a case concerning the classification of SIM cards as inputs or capital goods for cenvat credit purposes. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s arguments, supported by legal precedents and court decisions, were valid. It found that the appellant&#039;s position aligned with the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision and established legal principles, setting aside the orders demanding interest and penalties. The judgment underscored the significance of legal precedents and interpretations in resolving disputes related to credit availed and liability for interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>