<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 696 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further verification based on the appellant&#039;s accounting treatment and CA certificate to ensure a fair opportunity for the appellant to present relevant documents before a final decision is made. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of examining records before passing a reasoned order, highlighting the need to verify if depreciation was appropriately reversed as claimed by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 696 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further verification based on the appellant&#039;s accounting treatment and CA certificate to ensure a fair opportunity for the appellant to present relevant documents before a final decision is made. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of examining records before passing a reasoned order, highlighting the need to verify if depreciation was appropriately reversed as claimed by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>