<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 691 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the imposition of penalties beyond 25% of the Anti-Dumping Duty amount on the appellants, who had paid the necessary sums before adjudication. The appeal was allowed regarding the penalty imposition on both appellants, as the Tribunal found no justification for additional penalties beyond the 25% already paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 691 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the imposition of penalties beyond 25% of the Anti-Dumping Duty amount on the appellants, who had paid the necessary sums before adjudication. The appeal was allowed regarding the penalty imposition on both appellants, as the Tribunal found no justification for additional penalties beyond the 25% already paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>