<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 687 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337607</link>
    <description>A writ petition concerning a sales tax demand under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 sought protection against encashment of an irrevocable bank guarantee while the petitioner pursued a statutory second appeal. The parties recorded that the guarantee would remain alive pending consideration of the stay application before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. The HC granted liberty to file the second appeal and accompanying stay application, and restrained the first respondent from encashing the bank guarantee until disposal of that application, preserving the petitioner&#039;s appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:05:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 687 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337607</link>
      <description>A writ petition concerning a sales tax demand under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 sought protection against encashment of an irrevocable bank guarantee while the petitioner pursued a statutory second appeal. The parties recorded that the guarantee would remain alive pending consideration of the stay application before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. The HC granted liberty to file the second appeal and accompanying stay application, and restrained the first respondent from encashing the bank guarantee until disposal of that application, preserving the petitioner&#039;s appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>