<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (4) TMI 79 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189563</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals against the implementation of the scheme and ordered the winding up of the company under section 392(2) of the Companies Act. The court found that the company was commercially insolvent, its substratum was gone, and the scheme could not be worked satisfactorily with or without modifications. The company was ordered to be wound up, and the liquidator was directed to act on the minutes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:47:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (4) TMI 79 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189563</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals against the implementation of the scheme and ordered the winding up of the company under section 392(2) of the Companies Act. The court found that the company was commercially insolvent, its substratum was gone, and the scheme could not be worked satisfactorily with or without modifications. The company was ordered to be wound up, and the liquidator was directed to act on the minutes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>