<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 459 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189560</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed Civil Appeal No.4340 of 1995 and dismissed the appeal arising from the Special Leave Petition, upholding the seniority lists and the promotion of direct recruits challenged by the promotees. The Court found no breakdown of the quota rule and rejected the retrospective application of the Office Memorandum&#039;s principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 459 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189560</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed Civil Appeal No.4340 of 1995 and dismissed the appeal arising from the Special Leave Petition, upholding the seniority lists and the promotion of direct recruits challenged by the promotees. The Court found no breakdown of the quota rule and rejected the retrospective application of the Office Memorandum&#039;s principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>