<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1338 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189559</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the Shikshan Sevak Scheme in Maharashtra, focusing on the appointment of teachers on an honorarium basis. The Court emphasized judicial discipline and overturned the modifications made by the Aurangabad bench of the High Court, stating that coordinate benches should not alter each other&#039;s orders without proper referral. The judgment aimed to maintain consistency and clarity in the scheme&#039;s implementation, ensuring uniformity and respect for decisions within the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1338 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189559</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the Shikshan Sevak Scheme in Maharashtra, focusing on the appointment of teachers on an honorarium basis. The Court emphasized judicial discipline and overturned the modifications made by the Aurangabad bench of the High Court, stating that coordinate benches should not alter each other&#039;s orders without proper referral. The judgment aimed to maintain consistency and clarity in the scheme&#039;s implementation, ensuring uniformity and respect for decisions within the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>