https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189542 A party that knowingly participates without protest in arbitration proceedings continued by an arbitrator after transfer may waive a contractual objection and be precluded from later challenging the award. The distinction is between objections arising from the parties' agreement and objections founded on breach of a mandatory statutory provision: waiver and acquiescence can defeat the former, but not the latter because there is no estoppel against statute. On the stated facts, the continuation of the proceedings was not contrary to any mandatory provision and involved only a contractual objection, so the challenge to the award was not sustainable. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:45:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189542 A party that knowingly participates without protest in arbitration proceedings continued by an arbitrator after transfer may waive a contractual objection and be precluded from later challenging the award. The distinction is between objections arising from the parties' agreement and objections founded on breach of a mandatory statutory provision: waiver and acquiescence can defeat the former, but not the latter because there is no estoppel against statute. On the stated facts, the continuation of the proceedings was not contrary to any mandatory provision and involved only a contractual objection, so the challenge to the award was not sustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189542