<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6428</link>
    <description>A payment received under a release deed was treated as income because it replaced periodic beneficial payments originally payable under the trust arrangement. The transfer of the beneficial interest did not alter the character of the receipt, which remained assessable as income in the hands of the recipient. However, the tax exemption created by the 8 October 1949 agreement was construed as attaching to the payment itself, not solely to Princess Niloufer personally. As the agreement did not confine the exemption to her alone, the benefit continued when the assignee stepped into her position, so the payment remained exempt from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6428</link>
      <description>A payment received under a release deed was treated as income because it replaced periodic beneficial payments originally payable under the trust arrangement. The transfer of the beneficial interest did not alter the character of the receipt, which remained assessable as income in the hands of the recipient. However, the tax exemption created by the 8 October 1949 agreement was construed as attaching to the payment itself, not solely to Princess Niloufer personally. As the agreement did not confine the exemption to her alone, the benefit continued when the assignee stepped into her position, so the payment remained exempt from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>