<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that payments made by the assessee to various entities were for contractual work and not for professional or technical services. Therefore, tax was correctly deducted under Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with no additional liability under Section 194J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 21:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that payments made by the assessee to various entities were for contractual work and not for professional or technical services. Therefore, tax was correctly deducted under Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with no additional liability under Section 194J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>