<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 660 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Authority for fresh decision regarding service tax liability on composite works contracts and residential complexes constructed for armed forces. The appellant&#039;s arguments, based on legal interpretations pre and post-01/06/2007, led to the acknowledgment of evolving case laws impacting tax liability. The reconsideration also extended to the penalties imposed under Section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review in light of updated legal perspectives. The appeal was allowed for re-evaluation, ensuring fair consideration of statutory provisions and interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 660 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Authority for fresh decision regarding service tax liability on composite works contracts and residential complexes constructed for armed forces. The appellant&#039;s arguments, based on legal interpretations pre and post-01/06/2007, led to the acknowledgment of evolving case laws impacting tax liability. The reconsideration also extended to the penalties imposed under Section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review in light of updated legal perspectives. The appeal was allowed for re-evaluation, ensuring fair consideration of statutory provisions and interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>