https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337566 The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deeming certain input services availed by the appellant as eligible under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Services related to business activities were accepted, while those involving construction or works contracts were rejected. The tribunal remanded the matter of transport and loading charges for further clarification. The penalty imposed was set aside due to the interpretational nature of the dispute. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337566 The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deeming certain input services availed by the appellant as eligible under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Services related to business activities were accepted, while those involving construction or works contracts were rejected. The tribunal remanded the matter of transport and loading charges for further clarification. The penalty imposed was set aside due to the interpretational nature of the dispute. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337566