<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 642 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the department&#039;s objections and allowing all seven appeals for the refund of unutilized CENVAT credit on input services for an EOU under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision was based on the recognition of the disputed services as input services in previous legal precedents, leading to the granting of the refund claims supported by relevant documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 642 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the department&#039;s objections and allowing all seven appeals for the refund of unutilized CENVAT credit on input services for an EOU under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The decision was based on the recognition of the disputed services as input services in previous legal precedents, leading to the granting of the refund claims supported by relevant documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>