<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 640 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337560</link>
    <description>Assessment orders enhancing turnover without issuing notice or affording a personal hearing were held unsustainable for breach of fair hearing requirements. Following an earlier identical ruling, the Madras HC set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters for fresh consideration on merits after giving the assessee an opportunity of personal hearing. The relief was limited to remand; the assessments were not finally adjudicated on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:00:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 640 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337560</link>
      <description>Assessment orders enhancing turnover without issuing notice or affording a personal hearing were held unsustainable for breach of fair hearing requirements. Following an earlier identical ruling, the Madras HC set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters for fresh consideration on merits after giving the assessee an opportunity of personal hearing. The relief was limited to remand; the assessments were not finally adjudicated on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>