<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 637 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337557</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed various issues including acceptance of notice and filing of objections, cancellation of a sale property, sale of properties attached by Income-Tax authorities, re-auction of properties under SEBI supervision, conditions for re-auction process and reserve prices, deposits and forfeitable security requirements for bidders, and submission of progress reports and compliance with court orders. Specific directions were given for each issue, with a focus on conducting a fresh auction for attached properties under SEBI supervision, setting reserve prices, and ensuring compliance with court orders to maintain the integrity of the auction process. Compliance with court orders and communication between parties were highlighted as crucial aspects of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:00:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 637 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337557</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed various issues including acceptance of notice and filing of objections, cancellation of a sale property, sale of properties attached by Income-Tax authorities, re-auction of properties under SEBI supervision, conditions for re-auction process and reserve prices, deposits and forfeitable security requirements for bidders, and submission of progress reports and compliance with court orders. Specific directions were given for each issue, with a focus on conducting a fresh auction for attached properties under SEBI supervision, setting reserve prices, and ensuring compliance with court orders to maintain the integrity of the auction process. Compliance with court orders and communication between parties were highlighted as crucial aspects of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>