https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189526 Statements recorded under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were found voluntary on the facts, because the earliest complaints of coercion and torture were not supported by the later allegations of confinement and denial of facilities. The court held that the belated embellishments did not prove coercion, duress, or illegal detention. It further held that officers acting under the Act were not police officers for Evidence Act purposes, so the statements could not be excluded in writ proceedings merely on the ground of inadmissibility or by analogy to customs law. Objections to admissibility or future reliance were left to be raised, if necessary, in the proper forum. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 18:03:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189526 Statements recorded under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act were found voluntary on the facts, because the earliest complaints of coercion and torture were not supported by the later allegations of confinement and denial of facilities. The court held that the belated embellishments did not prove coercion, duress, or illegal detention. It further held that officers acting under the Act were not police officers for Evidence Act purposes, so the statements could not be excluded in writ proceedings merely on the ground of inadmissibility or by analogy to customs law. Objections to admissibility or future reliance were left to be raised, if necessary, in the proper forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189526