https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189523 Parity in employment discipline applies only where employees are similarly situated. A workman who continued to justify his conduct, rather than tendering an unqualified apology and accepting the charges, was held to stand on a different footing from employees who had expressed remorse and given undertakings. The employer's differential treatment was supported by a real and relevant distinction, so the termination sustained by the Tribunal could not be invalidated on a discrimination argument. The High Court erred in treating that distinction as artificial and in interfering with the Tribunal's conclusion upholding termination. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:50:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189523 Parity in employment discipline applies only where employees are similarly situated. A workman who continued to justify his conduct, rather than tendering an unqualified apology and accepting the charges, was held to stand on a different footing from employees who had expressed remorse and given undertakings. The employer's differential treatment was supported by a real and relevant distinction, so the termination sustained by the Tribunal could not be invalidated on a discrimination argument. The High Court erred in treating that distinction as artificial and in interfering with the Tribunal's conclusion upholding termination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189523