<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1173 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189509</link>
    <description>The court upheld the applicability of service tax on the land premium money for leased land, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments. The judgment clarified that the entire transaction, including premium and rent, is subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The court dismissed the petition without costs, emphasizing that the premium is considered part of the lease money and is taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=455009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1173 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189509</link>
      <description>The court upheld the applicability of service tax on the land premium money for leased land, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments. The judgment clarified that the entire transaction, including premium and rent, is subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The court dismissed the petition without costs, emphasizing that the premium is considered part of the lease money and is taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>