<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (5) TMI 71 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189495</link>
    <description>Extension of time to issue a customs seizure notice cannot be granted ex parte after expiry of the prescribed period where the affected person&#039;s right to return of seized goods has vested; such an extension requires sufficient cause and compliance with natural justice. The second extension was therefore invalid, entitling the appellant to return of the goods. A show-cause notice for confiscation must communicate clear, specific and unambiguous grounds so that an effective defence can be made; vague references rendered the notice unsustainable. Penalty also requires allegations of the relevant conduct or omission and requisite knowledge, which were absent, making the penal proposal defective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:52:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (5) TMI 71 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189495</link>
      <description>Extension of time to issue a customs seizure notice cannot be granted ex parte after expiry of the prescribed period where the affected person&#039;s right to return of seized goods has vested; such an extension requires sufficient cause and compliance with natural justice. The second extension was therefore invalid, entitling the appellant to return of the goods. A show-cause notice for confiscation must communicate clear, specific and unambiguous grounds so that an effective defence can be made; vague references rendered the notice unsustainable. Penalty also requires allegations of the relevant conduct or omission and requisite knowledge, which were absent, making the penal proposal defective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>