https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189494 A co-accused's confession under TADA section 15 was held usable only when the maker and the co-accused are charged and tried together; because the maker died before trial was completed, the confession was inadmissible against the other accused. Section 30 of the Evidence Act did not expand that statutory requirement. TADA section 4 was construed broadly to cover conspiracy, abetment, advocacy and facilitation of disruptive activity, and speeches and propaganda inciting Khalistan-related secessionist conduct were found sufficient to sustain conviction. The acquittal of the remaining accused on conspiracy, murder and allied charges was not interfered with, as the evidence did not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189494 A co-accused's confession under TADA section 15 was held usable only when the maker and the co-accused are charged and tried together; because the maker died before trial was completed, the confession was inadmissible against the other accused. Section 30 of the Evidence Act did not expand that statutory requirement. TADA section 4 was construed broadly to cover conspiracy, abetment, advocacy and facilitation of disruptive activity, and speeches and propaganda inciting Khalistan-related secessionist conduct were found sufficient to sustain conviction. The acquittal of the remaining accused on conspiracy, murder and allied charges was not interfered with, as the evidence did not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189494