https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189492 Regularization of contractual public employment was held to depend on a legal right and corresponding statutory duty; long service alone does not create an enforceable claim to permanent absorption, and mandamus cannot issue without that foundation. The Court applied the binding principles governing temporary, casual and contractual appointments and found that the earlier approach of the Tribunal and High Court needed fresh scrutiny in light of the later Constitution Bench ruling. The matter was therefore remitted to the High Court for reconsideration under the governing law on regularization. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:29:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189492 Regularization of contractual public employment was held to depend on a legal right and corresponding statutory duty; long service alone does not create an enforceable claim to permanent absorption, and mandamus cannot issue without that foundation. The Court applied the binding principles governing temporary, casual and contractual appointments and found that the earlier approach of the Tribunal and High Court needed fresh scrutiny in light of the later Constitution Bench ruling. The matter was therefore remitted to the High Court for reconsideration under the governing law on regularization. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189492