<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 607 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337527</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged an Order-in-Original confirming service tax liability, interest, and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority regarding reimbursements of salaries and wages paid to employees deputed to a sister concern. The Tribunal, relying on precedents involving similar cases, found that such reimbursements were not taxable. Consequently, the impugned order confirming service tax liability was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:24:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 607 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337527</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged an Order-in-Original confirming service tax liability, interest, and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority regarding reimbursements of salaries and wages paid to employees deputed to a sister concern. The Tribunal, relying on precedents involving similar cases, found that such reimbursements were not taxable. Consequently, the impugned order confirming service tax liability was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>