<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sub-contractors, not appellant, liable for duties on storage system installation under relevant manufacturing rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32811</link>
    <description>Manufacture - sub-contract - erection and installation of storage system - said activity carried out by sub contractor therefore appellant cannot be treated as manufacturer of storage system accordingly, duty should have been demanded if at all applicable, it is from the sub contractors - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:22:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sub-contractors, not appellant, liable for duties on storage system installation under relevant manufacturing rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32811</link>
      <description>Manufacture - sub-contract - erection and installation of storage system - said activity carried out by sub contractor therefore appellant cannot be treated as manufacturer of storage system accordingly, duty should have been demanded if at all applicable, it is from the sub contractors - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:22:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>