<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 604 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Char/Dolochar are not subject to excise duty and are not considered manufactured or excisable goods. The decision was based on legal interpretations and precedents, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 604 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Char/Dolochar are not subject to excise duty and are not considered manufactured or excisable goods. The decision was based on legal interpretations and precedents, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>