<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (6) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6410</link>
    <description>Wealth-tax proceedings against a deceased person&#039;s estate were held to be without statutory authority where the Wealth-tax Act did not permit assessment for the relevant year in the hands of the executors, rendering the assessment and appellate orders null and void. The Court also recognised that tax paid under mistake of law can be recovered in writ jurisdiction under article 226 where the foundational demand itself lacks authority of law. Limitation runs from discovery of the mistake, and the refund claim was not barred because the mistake was discovered only after the later decision clarifying the legal position. The tax recovery was therefore set aside and refund directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (6) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6410</link>
      <description>Wealth-tax proceedings against a deceased person&#039;s estate were held to be without statutory authority where the Wealth-tax Act did not permit assessment for the relevant year in the hands of the executors, rendering the assessment and appellate orders null and void. The Court also recognised that tax paid under mistake of law can be recovered in writ jurisdiction under article 226 where the foundational demand itself lacks authority of law. Limitation runs from discovery of the mistake, and the refund claim was not barred because the mistake was discovered only after the later decision clarifying the legal position. The tax recovery was therefore set aside and refund directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>