<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 592 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337512</link>
    <description>Input tax credit was treated as admissible on ingot mould car bogie assembly used within the factory to move molten metal, semi-finished goods, finished goods and other materials between divisions, because the item was considered integral to the manufacturing process. The reasoning relied on a Board circular stating that components, spares and accessories used with specified capital goods qualify for credit regardless of classification, and on prior reasoning that railway tracks used inside a plant for handling raw and processed material support credit eligibility. Authorities cited by the Revenue were held inapplicable on the facts, and the credit denial was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 592 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337512</link>
      <description>Input tax credit was treated as admissible on ingot mould car bogie assembly used within the factory to move molten metal, semi-finished goods, finished goods and other materials between divisions, because the item was considered integral to the manufacturing process. The reasoning relied on a Board circular stating that components, spares and accessories used with specified capital goods qualify for credit regardless of classification, and on prior reasoning that railway tracks used inside a plant for handling raw and processed material support credit eligibility. Authorities cited by the Revenue were held inapplicable on the facts, and the credit denial was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>