https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337503 Where the company and its directors were proceeded against jointly and severally, a single pre-deposit satisfied the statutory pre-condition for hearing the appeal. The Delhi High Court held that separate deposits for the petitioner company and its directors were not required, and that one deposit equal to 7.5% of the duty drawback element was sufficient compliance. The appeals were therefore permitted to proceed on the basis of that single qualifying deposit, and the appellate authority was directed to decide them in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337503 Where the company and its directors were proceeded against jointly and severally, a single pre-deposit satisfied the statutory pre-condition for hearing the appeal. The Delhi High Court held that separate deposits for the petitioner company and its directors were not required, and that one deposit equal to 7.5% of the duty drawback element was sufficient compliance. The appeals were therefore permitted to proceed on the basis of that single qualifying deposit, and the appellate authority was directed to decide them in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337503