<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Illicit Goods Transport with Fake Consignors: Validity of Seizure and Cash Security Demand Upheld u/s 48 U.P. VAT Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32839</link>
    <description>Evasion of tax - goods transported illegally - consignors and consignees are non-existent - seizure - Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, seizure of goods and demand of cash security for its release u/s 48 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 is valid? - Attempt to evade duty proved - Action taken by the revenue sustained - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:16:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Illicit Goods Transport with Fake Consignors: Validity of Seizure and Cash Security Demand Upheld u/s 48 U.P. VAT Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32839</link>
      <description>Evasion of tax - goods transported illegally - consignors and consignees are non-existent - seizure - Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, seizure of goods and demand of cash security for its release u/s 48 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 is valid? - Attempt to evade duty proved - Action taken by the revenue sustained - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:16:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>