<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 580 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337500</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned orders due to the Assessing Authority&#039;s failure to conduct re-assessment as directed by the appellate authority. It found that the orders were passed without following specific directions, leading to discrepancies in the assessment process. The court ordered the matter to be remanded back to the Assessing Authority for re-assessment within three months, emphasizing compliance with the appellate authority&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:16:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 580 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337500</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned orders due to the Assessing Authority&#039;s failure to conduct re-assessment as directed by the appellate authority. It found that the orders were passed without following specific directions, leading to discrepancies in the assessment process. The court ordered the matter to be remanded back to the Assessing Authority for re-assessment within three months, emphasizing compliance with the appellate authority&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>