<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (4) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6407</link>
    <description>Registration under section 26A was a statutory benefit available only on strict compliance with the prescribed forms and rules, including signatures of all non-minor partners and correct disclosure of partners&#039; profit and loss shares. The applications were invalid because the minor&#039;s position was incorrectly shown, and the required indication that he was entitled only to profits was omitted. A later attempt to amend the partnership deed could not cure the defect after the application period had expired, and the plea of substantial compliance was rejected. The later provision in the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held inapplicable, and the assessee was not entitled to registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (4) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6407</link>
      <description>Registration under section 26A was a statutory benefit available only on strict compliance with the prescribed forms and rules, including signatures of all non-minor partners and correct disclosure of partners&#039; profit and loss shares. The applications were invalid because the minor&#039;s position was incorrectly shown, and the required indication that he was entitled only to profits was omitted. A later attempt to amend the partnership deed could not cure the defect after the application period had expired, and the plea of substantial compliance was rejected. The later provision in the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held inapplicable, and the assessee was not entitled to registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>