https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189483 Repeated absence by the appellant and failure to disclose the status of parallel proceedings before the High Court and Supreme Court were treated as non-cooperation and an undue use of interim protection. To safeguard revenue recovery, the Tribunal withdrew the stay order and directed notice to the appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for abuse of process of law. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:32:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189483 Repeated absence by the appellant and failure to disclose the status of parallel proceedings before the High Court and Supreme Court were treated as non-cooperation and an undue use of interim protection. To safeguard revenue recovery, the Tribunal withdrew the stay order and directed notice to the appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for abuse of process of law. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189483