https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189479 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to the appellant's situation for the relevant periods. The judgment emphasized the non-applicability of the rule to trading activities and the correct availing of Cenvat credit by the appellant for taxable services. Consequently, the impugned duty demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:00:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189479 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to the appellant's situation for the relevant periods. The judgment emphasized the non-applicability of the rule to trading activities and the correct availing of Cenvat credit by the appellant for taxable services. Consequently, the impugned duty demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189479