https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189467 Delay in challenging an industrial punishment can justify denial or moulding of relief where the objection is specifically raised and accepted on the facts. The prior Supreme Court ruling relied on was treated as fact-specific because it did not lay down any general rule and the delay objection had not been raised in that proceeding. Relief in industrial adjudication was stated to depend on the facts and circumstances of each case, and the Tribunal's discretionary decision, as affirmed by the High Court, was found not to suffer from serious illegality. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:11:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189467 Delay in challenging an industrial punishment can justify denial or moulding of relief where the objection is specifically raised and accepted on the facts. The prior Supreme Court ruling relied on was treated as fact-specific because it did not lay down any general rule and the delay objection had not been raised in that proceeding. Relief in industrial adjudication was stated to depend on the facts and circumstances of each case, and the Tribunal's discretionary decision, as affirmed by the High Court, was found not to suffer from serious illegality. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189467