https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189463 The Allahabad High Court, in a judgment by Justices M. Katju and R. Tripathi, ruled that the High Court does not have the authority to fix loan installments under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that such matters are contractual and fall outside its jurisdiction, advising judicial restraint. The petitioner's request was dismissed, with the directive for any deposited amount to be adjusted by the Bank. The judgment underscores the importance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries and refraining from intervening in contractual issues beyond the Court's purview. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:45:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189463 The Allahabad High Court, in a judgment by Justices M. Katju and R. Tripathi, ruled that the High Court does not have the authority to fix loan installments under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that such matters are contractual and fall outside its jurisdiction, advising judicial restraint. The petitioner's request was dismissed, with the directive for any deposited amount to be adjusted by the Bank. The judgment underscores the importance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries and refraining from intervening in contractual issues beyond the Court's purview. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189463